منابع مشابه
Justification of Argumentation Schemes
Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, especially defeasible ones like argument from expert opinion, that have proved troublesome to view deductively or inductively. Much practical work has already been done on argumentation schemes, proving their worth in [19], but more precise investigations are needed to formalize their structur...
متن کاملArgumentation-Based Answer Set Justification
We suggest a method for justifying why a literal is or is not contained in the answer set of a logic program. This method makes use of argumentation theory, more precisely of stable ASPIC+ extensions. We describe a way to translate a logic program into an ASPIC+ argumentation theory and investigate the relation between answer sets of the logic program and stable extensions of the translated ASP...
متن کاملApplications of Argumentation Schemes
Argumentation schemes capture common, stereotypical patterns of reasoning which are nondeductive and nonmonotonic. As interest in understanding these schemes from a theoretical point of view grows, so too does an awareness within computational work that these schemes might yield powerful techniques in a range of domains. This paper aims to perform two functions. First, to briefly review the lit...
متن کاملArgumentation Schemes and Enthymemes
The aim of this investigation is to explore the role of argumentation schemes in enthymeme reconstruction. This aim is pursued by studying selected cases of incomplete arguments in natural language discourse to see what the requirements are for filling in the unstated premises and conclusions in some systematic and useful way. Some of these cases are best handled using deductive tools, while ot...
متن کاملInterpretative Argumentation Schemes
Tarello (1980) identified fifteen kinds of arguments used for statutory interpretation, and later, MacCormick and Summers (1991) recognized eleven types of interpretive arguments. Building on this work, the aim of this paper, part of a wider research project, is to formulate argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation. To indicate the direction of this work, an example of one of the sche...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Australasian Journal of Logic
سال: 2005
ISSN: 1448-5052
DOI: 10.26686/ajl.v3i0.1769